🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where Black people are compensated to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the method the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to erase the history of people of color and experience from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration symbolises how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and adaptive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.